On 14 January 2019, the Collaboration for Sustainable
Development of Viscose (CV) convened about 120 participants from the viscose,
yarn, fashion, pulp, forestry and NGO sectors to a multi-stakeholder dialogue
in Beijing. Spanning from China, Europe,
Southeast Asia and USA, these participants were invited to exchange perspectives and recommendations for a sustainable viscose industry.
News link:http://www.cvroadmap.com/Newsen/201901/47.html
MEETING MINUTES Round table on Sustainable Development of
Viscose 14 January 2019, 9.00 AM – 4.00 PM Grand Hyatt Hotel, Beijing |
||
Facilitator: Liesel Truscott, Textile Exchange |
||
Time |
Speaker |
Topic &
Key Message Points |
0900-0910 |
Yan Yan, |
Welcome CV ·
self-initiated by producers and self-regulating ·
a platform to demonstrate and make progress on transparency ·
aims to build capacity of producers and accelerate sustainable
development of this industry |
0910-0920 |
Liesl Truscott, Textile
Exchange |
Dialogue Objectives · Encourage openness and transparency · To learn from each other · To apply systems thinking - join the pieces together to see how all fit together · To seek pre-competitive collaboration and collective action |
0920-1000 |
Zhang Zixin, CV |
Review of CV’s
Work in 2018 and Next Steps · Introducing the CV Roadmap · Comparison of different criteria and CV methodology · CV Roadmap 2025 o Action plan – next steps o Longer term plan o Stakeholder feedback to be included in plan Hot Topics of Viscose · Procurement – forests o Most viscose producers do not produce pulp, therefore are not forestry experts o Need to identify who are the authority of sustainable forestry work and consult with them accordingly, as well as identify the tools for verification · Production o Clean Production Standards (CPS) vs EU-BAT - Most indicators are comparable, and both require the same level of performance in most indicators. The challenge is there is no harmonization in the measurement units and methodologies of the indicators; as such, standardization is needed |
1000-1030 |
Huang Wen Bin, |
Overview on Global Forestry ·
Deforestation in tropical areas and forest degradation in temperate
and boreal forests are both risks to the world ·
WWF supports certification such as FSC, as well as inclusive approacheswhile
recognizing that there are various other components/pathways that are able to
address issues ·
China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of paper products,
and therefore needs to play a more important role in the sustainable
development of forests. ·
Supply chain transparency is a necessary step towards transformation
and sustainable change. ·
Forest sustainability depends on the support of regulations and
certifications. It is recommended that enterprises ensure their wood-based
raw materials are from sustainable sources through third-party certification
and verification. ·
While WWFsupports FSC, it also recognizes different countries have
different conditions where only one certification may not be sufficient. Companies
have to evaluate accordingly before developing sourcing policy. |
1030-1045 |
Morning Tea-break |
|
1045-1110 |
Zhang Xinxin, |
·
FSC and PEFC are the world’s largest certifications, both are believed
to support sustainable forestry management ·
Hope CanopyStyle criteriacan be incorporated in CV Roadmap ·
Definition of ancient and endangered forest is mapped on forest mapper
and the wording of the definition is a bit complicated and please consult
CANOPY for detailed explanation, ·
Forestmapper is still new and
may not be complete/holistic, NepCon will use more than one tool to do risk
mapping of viscose producers’ supply chain |
1110-1135 |
Boris Saraber, |
Understanding & Achieving Zero Deforestation ·
Industry transformation is the ultimate goal which needs on-the-ground
knowledge, and there are no single solutions ·
Certification is a tool; there are other means of verification and alternatives
to support an inclusive approach to risk management and transformation
including various certification standards, on the ground engagements, scientific
methodologies and satellite-based tools. ·
There are a number of deforestation-monitoring map platforms in the
market – e.g. Canopy’s Forestmapper, WRI’s Forest Global Watch. From our knowledge of different tools such
as these, we have seen in the past that often false- positives appear; whilea
tool that offers near real-time monitoring, such as Starling, has been
developed to build on these learnings ·
Encourages CV members to be more pro-active in communicating the
positive changes that have taken place since the launch of the CV Roadmap and
continue to do so. ·
Encourages brands to adopt a change-transformation approach rather than
a risk-management approach via elimination through understanding the real
situations on the ground, for e.g. in Sumatra, the main deforestation driver
is not companies but small farmers. ·
A risk mitigation approach can be limited in driving real
transformation as it often serves to de-link brands buying power away from
promoting and supporting with change on the ground, which ultimately drives
industry transformation |
1135-1330 |
Lunch |
|
1330-1355 |
Gundolf Klaehn, Partnership
for Sustainable Textiles Thivararan Kumarsamy , |
Brand sustainable purchasing policy and practice ·
Standards have to be
practical and implementable, not just remain a piece of paper because no one
can achieve them ·
Traceability for viscose supply chain is becoming more important for
the brands. ·
Supports Canopy and Changing Markets Foundations (CMF) ·
Brands do not have capacity to verify change on the ground of forestry · As brands can be lacking in knowledge of viable forestry practices, the responsibility for ensuring sustainable practices often falls to that of the viscose or pulp producers · Brands therefore rely on guidance, certification and third-party verification |
1355-1430 |
Li Shite, |
CV Sustainability Report Preview ·
Target to launch in March 2019 ·
Provides an important baseline for CV to know the current
sustainability performance and provide targeted guidance for improvement. ·
CV members need to improve on fundamentals as well as support for
transparency such as data submission ·
UNFCCC incorporation for long-term goal setting |
1430-1530 |
Q&A Questions/feedback from brands Brand: ·
More transparency required ·
Would there be more precise reporting, including disclosing and rating
performance of each member? CV: o CV understands the importance of
transparency and will work towards improvement o In CV’s engagement with brands,
realise downstream does not really understand upstream. Recognize there is
much room for improvement in reporting and disclosure; CV will continue to
improve on this front. o CV will be launching its first Sustainability
Reportin March 2019 which will provide some data on the performance of CV
members. o CV needs to first understand how
EU-BAT figures are arrived. We will also explain how we arrive at our
standards limits, including methodologies. o CV has started working on our CV
Roadmap 2025, and will conduct invite stakeholder in due course. Brand:How do you verify members’
performance – by 3rd party? CV: o Most of the requirements in the CV
Roadmap involves third-party verification, such as FSC, Oeko-Tex STeP and
ZHDC) o Certain technical indicators may
require longer time period for verification, in particularly when
benchmarking with the likes of EU-BAT which we currently do not have sufficient
understanding of, especially on indicators relating to air emissions. Until CV
gets more clarity on EU-BAT, we will focus on the Clean Production Standards
(CPS). Brand:What is the position to use tools
like HIGG? Oeko-Step? CV: o CV has no preference for Higg over
Oeko-Tex STeP, vice versa. Both are acceptable. o Currently more chose to do STeP
Oeko-Tex becausethe auditor invited to present about Higg FEM 3.0 informed
that Higg FEM 3.0 was not auditable then(2018.1) Brands:Brands ask for sustainability
point of contact for each viscose producer. Can CV provide? CV: o CV deals with different topics and
for each topic area there are different responsible personnel from each
member company. Not every CV member has a dedicated sustainability personnel. o We will send you the contact list
after the meeting, but for above-mentioned reason, not all contacts listed
here are sustainability personnel. Brands:Brands have developed a self-assessment
survey for viscose producers; can CV get its members to do the survey? CV: o Yes. o Viscose producers already have to
undertake a lot of audits, standards. Hope brands can simplify the process
and not duplicate work for producers. o CV suggests that the survey can be
standardized and promote more brand use it, which can reduce repetitive work. Brands: What is the difference between CV and EU-BAT
standards? CV: o Most of indicators are comparable. o Some of the EU-BAT indicators,however,
are not complete/holistic o Raw material and manufacturing are
different. On raw material front, have to
rely heavily on pulp producers to drive sustainable development On manufacturing front, CV is
working with ZDHC to see areas which can be improved, including discussing
about EU-BAT. EU-BAT is astatic standard, what
next after reaching those targets? It is not clear. o There are a lot of questions about
EU-BAT that CV wanted to clarify and have asked CMF accordingly but received
no response from them. Brands:Does CV’s 2025 roadmap aim to
align with or supersedethe CMF roadmap? CV: o Has been working to get a baseline
of all its members to help identify areas for improvement o Some members already outperform
some of the CMF indicators. Need to understand how limits of other indicators
are arrived in order to strive towards meeting those targets. o CMF have been invited to clarify
but they declined |
|
1530-1600 |
Yan Yan |
Closing Few key takeaways from the events: · Transparency as the basis for trust; CV will strive for more transparency · Multi-stakeholder– sustainability issues are not caused by one entity in the value chain and resolution cannot be achieved by single entity · Participation from industry and collaboration with key stakeholders should be intensified · Competence building of CV members required |
1600-1800 |
Afternoon Tea-Break & Networking |
|
1800-1900 |
Dinner |